Skip navigation.

Improving the User Experience for Desktop Sysadmins - Sabayon

GNOME
GNOME

Seth wrote: The three immediate design stakeholders in the 'enterprise desktop' are: end users, help desk staff, and desktop system administrators. Most design work for GNOME has gone into improving the end user experience, which is really the dominant stakeholder of those three. Some improvements aimed at end-users, like promoting preferences instead of settings you can get wrong, have also made life a little easier for help desk staff (as people are that much less likely to hose things). Recently Mark's work on Vino has added a very large improvement for help desk staff: the ability to remotely view and operate user's desktops (there is nothing more frustrating than blindly stepping people through computer operations over the phone).

So what about sysadmins? Sabayon is GNOME's first major design targeted at improving the user experience for people who administer GNOME systems, and hopefully the start of an initiative toward designing for this important group of users...

Read the rest

Gnome Users have no obligation to promote KDE!

This is GNOMEdesktop.org, so discussion of KDE is generally off-topic here. Why do you imagine that people would be interested in discussing (much less praising!) KDE in a gnome forum? I certainly don't expect KDE users to be discussing gnome in the KDE forums.

The person who started this thread WAS trolling, by making the unreasonable demand that Sabayon developers (and the gnome community leaders!) should spend their time praising KDE kiosk technology, rather than talking about the features of what *they* are developing. This is an absurd demand, and therefore just an attempt to start a flamewar, imo. Accusing people of playing "petty politics" simply because they are not writing about the things you are interested in is just not reasonable.

Once Sabayon is developed, then I can see the value of comparative reviews and discussion of these and other related technologies, but I don't think either the Gnome or KDE forums are sufficiently neutral venues for these types of articles.

As for why Nat, Miguel, and the other Gnome community leaders don't talk about KDE -- I'd guess it's because whenever they've done so in the past they've been mercilessly flamed for it by KDE fans. If I were in their position, I'd spend my time working on, and talking about the stuff I'm interested in (Gnome, etc.), rather than being drawn into discussions about competing desktops, just to provide KDE fanboys with a target for their flamage!